I suspect the next step is that someone (Wayne Mapp or Don B) will pose the question whether disaffected white people can challenge race-based funding programmes in court.
Hopefully there will be some kind of outcome that says that positive discrimination is okay discrimination.
Then will Helen and co argue that reducing payments to beneficiaries IS positive discrimination, since it encourages them to enter work, thus reducing the gap (work) between them and the workers?
That would be a shocker. Interesting case though!
Apologies about not replying about your tax email - I really enjoyed your comments, did you get any reply from Tsy?? I've been busy (exam last week) so will get back to you next week. Handing in thesis on Tuesday next...
1 comment:
Yeah! Interesting implications aye
I suspect the next step is that someone (Wayne Mapp or Don B) will pose the question whether disaffected white people can challenge race-based funding programmes in court.
Hopefully there will be some kind of outcome that says that positive discrimination is okay discrimination.
Then will Helen and co argue that reducing payments to beneficiaries IS positive discrimination, since it encourages them to enter work, thus reducing the gap (work) between them and the workers?
That would be a shocker. Interesting case though!
Apologies about not replying about your tax email - I really enjoyed your comments, did you get any reply from Tsy?? I've been busy (exam last week) so will get back to you next week. Handing in thesis on Tuesday next...
Cheers
Post a Comment